8 steps to help address EHR woes with team documentation

AMA Wire
Email this page

While electronic health record (EHR) systems can be beneficial, the chief complaint with the technology for many physicians is that they’ve become typists and must spend time away from patient care for documentation. But some practices have found a solution to this problem by implementing team documentation—and they’re seeing returns on their investments. Learn how you can take this approach in your practice.

Team documentation is a process in which staff assist with documenting visit notes, entering orders and referrals, and queuing up prescriptions in real-time while they are in the exam room with the physician and the patient. This frees the physician to focus on the patient.

For physicians implementing team documentation, it’s working. While many physicians are stuck spending hours in the evenings and on weekends with their EHRs, those who are using scribing aren’t.

“The only time I’ll ever even look at the computer is if I’m pulling up an X-ray or something,” said James Jerzak, MD, a family medicine physician from Wisconsin. “I never document at home. Everything is done and closed by the time I leave the office.”

Another Wisconsin physician, Richard Fossen, MD, said his internal medicine clinic has seen a return on investment since moving to team documentation.

“The revenue increases quite quickly once you get your model in place and your efficiencies run and you can open up slots in your schedule,” Dr. Fossen said. “You can see a return on your investment in a fairly short period of time.”

free online module in the AMA’s STEPS Forward collection shows you how to implement team documentation in your practice. Visit the module to calculate what your practice could save and get an in-depth look at what team documentation looks like in practice. But first, read these eight steps to team documentation.

  • Create a change team. You can’t make a big change in your practice without help. Select a high-level champion and a multi-disciplinary team that can agree on the goals, such as improved patient and clinician satisfaction and improved productivity.
  • Decide who will help with team documentation. Will it be a medical assistant, a nurse, a pre-med student, a former transcriptionist or a dedicated scribe? The type of assistant will determine his or her scope of work.
  • Determine the model your practice will use. Will the assistant only help with documentation or also perform clinical tasks? In a documentation-only model, the non-clinical assistant will travel with the physician from patient to patient and assist with notation. In the advanced team-based care model, the assistant is usually a nurse or medical assistant and stays with the patient from the beginning to the end of the appointment, performing pre-visit and post-visit functions. Learn more about these models in more detail in the module.
  • Start with a pilot. Developing collaborative care is hard work, so start small. A pilot of one or two physicians can reveal any bugs to work out before spreading to more physicians. Many practices report a three- to six-month learning curve. Get answers to questions on this piece of the process in the module.
  • Select the pilot personnel based on commitment. The physician in the pilot should be willing to invest in training staff and learning a new model. Staff should be enthusiastic about assuming new responsibilities and being trailblazers. The module has more information on the qualities of the personnel who should be involved in the pilot.
  • Define your work flow. Identify who will perform which responsibilities during each patient visit. Will template notes be used? How will the physician sign team notes and orders?
  • Start small. In the beginning, you might do team care for only some of your scheduled patients, or you might take this approach for all of your patients but only a few days a week. Use a rolling start to refine the process and avoid change fatigue.
  • Meet weekly. Training is ongoing. The team should meet at least weekly to review and adjust the work flow and continue the educational process about clinical issues, billing and coding.

Many more details on this process can be found in the module, including stories from real-life physicians such as Drs. Jerzak and Fossen. The module also includes information about how to get support for intervention implementation, and it offers continuing medical education credit. More than 25 modules are expected to be available in the AMA’s STEPS Forward collection by the end of the year.

Working for EHR relief

An AMA study with the RAND Corporation shows that EHRs are a major driver of physicians’ dissatisfaction with their practice environments. As a result, the AMA worked with doctors and other experts to create eight priorities for making EHRs usable and use the priorities to guide work with vendors, policymakers and health care systems.

Plan to participate in a special town hall meeting from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. Eastern time Sept. 29 at the Massachusetts Medical Society’s headquarters in Waltham, Mass. The meeting will give participants an opportunity to shine a spotlight on the problems with meaningful use regulations and what they have meant for your patients and practice. If you’re not in the Boston area, you can participate via live streaming, beginning at 7 p.m. Eastern time. Sign up today.

Visit breaktheredtape.org to share your story and contact your members of Congress about the meaningful use program. Also, read more about recent letters the AMA and more than 40 national specialty societies recently sent to the Department of Health and Human Services and Office of Management and Budget.

Email this page


Ah...I have been saying for years that medical Doctors are just idiot savants. We know our medicine quite well but that is where it ends. Step back and ask where did the computerization of medical records come from and you m-I-g-h-t see that it certainly was not from Doctors. It makes the Doctor-Patient relationship disintegrate but it certainly allows legal infiltration and blame to go directly onto the shoulders of the Doctors for NOT doing this new chore that you never asked for before. Yet the Doctors just hang their heads and follow and follow and follow. Idiot Savants. So sad.
October 3, 2015<br/> AMA Wire<br/> Re "8 Steps to help address woes with team documentation" (September 25).<br/> Although the team approach seems to increase efficiency and even to increase the income for some practices I don't think that it is meant for everyone. At least not for veterans like myself who have been in practice for 40 years.<br/> Why the negativity? The team approach adds more layers between doctor and patient. Many of my patients would be inhibited by having to be "processed" by the different team members.<br/> My patients like the confidentiality and intimacy of just them and me during the office visit.<br/> I had discussed this with a younger colleague who is employed by a large hospital network. He said that I just didn't know to take advantage of the newer approaches. <br/> For example he said that by using a medical assistant to do all the intake and the social history he was freed up to just focus on the patients' symptoms.<br/> Proudly he announced that this allowed him to see "four or five more patients a day". He implied of course that his revenue had increased. I didn't want to argue with him but when I shook my head he got my messge.<br/> My point? Are we beguiled by the increased revenue that results from the team approach that it really improves patient care?<br/> Is the team approach hastening the demise of personal care and changing the way that our patients and society will see us?<br/> Worse is it changing the way that we see ourselves?<br/> Doctors can only answer these question by looking deep within themselves.<br/> Edward Volpintesta MD<br/> Bethel, CT 06801
Dr. Fossen is either overstaffed, a hospital based doctor, an academian, or willing to spend his money for scribes, because their is no way he can use EHR without looking at a computer.<br/> Another piece of the AMA farce. EHR is an information, auditing grab that will put the final nail in the coffin. Medicare will mandate online access to all physicians computers so that auditing viruses can be used to detect "abuses and overcharges" by physicians.<br/> Physician payments will then be based on following the "prescribed " treatment plan "recommended" code for mandated by Medicare. Deviations will be remedied by reduction in Medicare payment.<br/> It's simple.<br/> It's obvious.<br/> The only fools that could fall for this are physicians.<br/> Shame on us.
Show Comments (3)